Estimated reading time: 12 minute(s)
The ECOWAS Court of Justice has ordered the government of Cross River State to repay $6,455,846 and an interest of 6.5% per annum starting from 31st August 2018 to the ECOWAS Bank for Investment and Development (EBID) being the amount outstanding from a loan granted to the state in 2005.
A three-man panel of the court gave the order in a unanimous judgment on Friday in a suit brought by the bank, an agency of ECOWAS, an official of the court, Elohor Ovadje said in a statement.
Justice Edward Amoako Asante, President of the court, who delivered the judgment, said the “sum represents the situation of the Tinapa Free Zone Project loan in the Applicant’s book as of 31st August 2018.”
The court also ordered Cross River to submit to the court, within two months, a report on its measures to implement the Court’s orders relating to the loan with which the government financed the Tinapa business resort.
It granted almost all the reliefs sought by the bank but declined EBID’s claim for immediate execution of the Irrevocable Standing Payment Order (ISPO) a loan condition precedent mandating the Accountant General of the Federal Republic of Nigeria tagged “Guarantee” in Clause 7.05 of the loan agreement to satisfy the indebtedness.
The court also refused to grant the EBID’s claim for solicitor’s fees on the ground that it was not backed by documentary evidence.
EBID had filed the suit, marked; ECW/CCJ/APP/14/19 on 2nd April 2019 urging the court to declare its Loan Agreement No 7/AP/LAR/FRDF/04/05 with Cross River as valid, binding and subsisting between the parties.
It also prayed the court to declare Cross River as having failed to fulfill a loan condition precedent, and proceed to compel it to repay the loan with interest.
It alleged that despite several demands, the Respondent refused and or neglected to repay the loan with a duration period of seven (7) years after a two-year moratorium.
In its response, Cross River admitted it approached EBID to part finance its TINAPA business and resort project located near its Calabar Free Trade Zone, and that both parties signed a loan agreement on 20th May 2005 for a sum of UA6, 525,371 equivalent of USD10, 000,000.
It claimed to have made repayments until 2010 when it defaulted due to an administrative issue and that the repayment schedule for the outstanding payment of $5,692,376 was restructured to run from 7 January 2010 to 1 January 2020. The Responded added that it paid installments totaling UA3, 277,080 by 1 January 2014.
In its judgment on Friday, the court noted that the Cross River defaulted on its repayment schedules.
Other members of the panel were Justices Gberi-Be Ouattara and Januaria Moreira Costa.
Also on. Friday, the court fixed judgment for March 11 in the suit filed by a Venezuelan, Alex Saab, allegedly detained by the government of the Republic of Cape Verde in response to an extradition request by the government of the United States.
In the suit marked: ECW/CCJ/APP/43/20, Saab stated that he was arrested during a refueling stopover of the aircraft in which he was traveling, and has been detained since last year by the authorities of Cape Verde.
In the suit, he is challenging his detention by the government of Cape Verde pending extradition at the request of the United States of America.
Saab argued that, as a special envoy on a diplomatic mission, he ought not to be arrested and detained by the Cape Verdean authorities.
In its response, Cape Verde submitted that Saab’s arrest and detention, pending his extradition was carried out based on the general principles of international judicial cooperation in criminal matters, in strict compliance with the provisions of Arts. 3 and 4 of Act No. 6/VIII/2011, of 29 August and that it is not in violation of Cape Verdean law or any international agreement, treaty or convention to which the country is a party.
It equally averred that Saab did not meet the requirements, qualifying him as a special envoy with the associated immunity.
The Court had in its ruling delivered on December 20, 2020 ordered the Republic of Cape Verde to place Saab under permanent home detention in good conditions, including allowing him access to medical treatment and visits.
The court equally ordered that he should not be extradited pending its decision on the substantive case.
The case was heard by a three-member panel made up Justices Edward Amoako Asante, Dupe Atoki and Januaria Moreira Costa.
Estimated reading time: 1 minute(s)
FOOTNOTE: Do you want to share a story with us? Do you want to advertise with us? Do you need publicity for a product, service, or event? Contact us on WhatsApp +2348183319097 or email: email@example.com